Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> "David A. Greene" <greened@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Use %B for Split Subject/Body
>
> This needs to say "contrib/subtree" somewhere (applies to all
> patches in this series).
Ok. Shall I re-send everything?
>> From: Techlive Zheng <techlivezheng@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Use %B to format the commit message and body to avoid an extra newline
>> if a commit only has a subject line.
>>
>> Author: Techlive Zheng <techlivezheng@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This needs to be a S-o-b instead; is it a real name, by the way?
Ok. No idea about the name but his online presence seems consistent at
least.
>> +# Save this hash for testing later.
>> +
>> +subdir_hash=`git rev-parse HEAD`
>> +
>
> We prefer $() over ``; much more readable.
Ack, of course. I don't know how I missed that.
>> # 15
>> test_expect_success 'add main6' '
>> create main6 &&
>
> Why?
It was in the original testsuite from Avery. I didn't add or remove any
tests when I first integrated git-subtree.
>> @@ -235,7 +238,19 @@ test_expect_success 'check split with --branch' '
>> check_equal ''"$(git rev-parse splitbr1)"'' "$spl1"
>
> Is quoting screwed up around here (and in many other places in this
> patch)? What are these no-op '' doing?
I assumed they are there to get the double-quotes around the command.
I'll see about removing them.
>> -# 25
>> +#25
>
> Why the lossage of a SP?
I think this got fixed later in the series.
> It may make sense to lose these "# num" that will have to be touched
> every time somebody inserts new test pieces in the middle, as a
> preparatory step before any of these patches, by the way. That will
> reduce noise in the patches for real changes.
Yeah, I know, but it makes it really easy to find a test when something
goes wrong.
-David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html