Re: [RFC] pack-objects: compression level for non-blobs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Fix pack-objects to behave the way JGit does, cluster commits first in
>> the pack stream. Now you have a dense space of commits. If I remember
>> right this has a tiny positive improvement for most rev-list
>> operations with very little downside.
>
> I was going to suggest a similar thing. The current state of C Git's
> pack writing is not bad. We mix commits and tags together, but tags

And I was wrong. At least since 1b4bb16 (pack-objects: optimize
"recency order" - 2011-06-30) commits are spread out and can be mixed
with trees too. Grouping them back defeats what Junio did in that
commit, I think.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]