Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] new git check-ignore sub-command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think they will interact, but I need to have a deeper look to Adam's series.
If it does, do you want me to base my work on the top of his branch ?

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Adam Spiers <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Adam Spiers <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> This v3 re-roll of my check-ignore series is a reasonably substantial
>>> revamp over v2, and applies on top of Junio's current
>>> nd/attr-match-optim-more branch (82dce998c202).
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Does this (and should this, if it doesn't) interact with the more
>> recent discussion around "git status --untracked/--ignored" [*1*],
>> which also wants to touch the recursive directory traversal logic in
>> "dir.c"?
>
> I cannot think of a reason why they would or should interact.  If I'm
> wrong, I expect that either set of unit tests would show me up :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]