On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 20:53:22 +0100, "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Santi_B=E9jar?=" wrote: > I was talking about the default name, so you could do: > > $ git clone\ > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git > $ cd linux-2.6 > $ git remote add \ > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-2.6.git > $ git remote show libata-2.6 Yes. I'd go one further and say that it'd be really nice if git-clone could be seen as equivalent, (and basically equivalent internally), to a simple sequence of steps that could be performed manually. Something like: name=$(basename $url) mkdir $name cd $name git init-db git remote add $url git pull $name I haven't played with the new git-remote stuff at all yet, but the rest of the above does work already, (but for a "warning: no common commits" message). The only thing missing compared to git-clone is the remotes configuration. So if the new git-remote can provide behavior equivalent to what git clone provides, that would be excellent. If for one have often wanted the ability to easily add a second remote as if from git-clone. -Carl
Attachment:
pgpENvqYzrVp9.pgp
Description: PGP signature