Re: [RFC] test: Old shells and physical paths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is "here is a nickel, get a better shell" an option?

It is, somewhat.  There is a pre-built port of GNU bash 2.03 for the
platform, but I was trying to see how far things could go with the
OS's supported shell before having to bring in unsupported
dependencies.  Unfortunately, I do not believe the OS fully conforms
to POSIX.1-2001 yet, so that means no "-P" or "-L" without going
rogue.

I'll carry test fixes for this platform locally.

Thanks.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]