Matthew Daley wrote:
Currently it gets the size of an otherwise unrelated, unused variable
instead of the expected struct size.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Daley <mattjd@xxxxxxxxx>
---
builtin/pack-redundant.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/pack-redundant.c b/builtin/pack-redundant.c
index f5c6afc..7544687 100644
--- a/builtin/pack-redundant.c
+++ b/builtin/pack-redundant.c
@@ -301,14 +301,14 @@ static void pll_free(struct pll *l)
*/
static struct pll * get_permutations(struct pack_list *list, int n)
{
- struct pll *subset, *ret = NULL, *new_pll = NULL, *pll;
+ struct pll *subset, *ret = NULL, *new_pll = NULL;
if (list == NULL || pack_list_size(list) < n || n == 0)
return NULL;
if (n == 1) {
while (list) {
- new_pll = xmalloc(sizeof(pll));
+ new_pll = xmalloc(sizeof(struct pll));
new_pll->pl = NULL;
pack_list_insert(&new_pll->pl, list);
new_pll->next = ret;
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static struct pll * get_permutations(struct
pack_list *list, int n) while (list->next) {
subset = get_permutations(list->next, n - 1);
while (subset) {
- new_pll = xmalloc(sizeof(pll));
+ new_pll = xmalloc(sizeof(struct pll));
Why not just
new_pll = xmalloc(sizeof(*new_pll));
new_pll->pl = subset->pl;
pack_list_insert(&new_pll->pl, list);
new_pll->next = ret;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html