When we look up a sha1 object for reading, we first check
packfiles, and then loose objects. If we still haven't found
it, we re-scan the list of packfiles in `objects/pack`. This
final step ensures that we can co-exist with a simultaneous
repack process which creates a new pack and then prunes the
old object.
This extra re-scan usually does not have a performance
impact for two reasons:
1. If an object is missing, then typically the re-scan
will find a new pack, then no more misses will occur.
Or if it truly is missing, then our next step is
usually to die().
2. Re-scanning is cheap enough that we do not even notice.
However, these do not always hold. The assumption in (1) is
that the caller is expecting to find the object. This is
usually the case, but the call to `parse_object` in
`everything_local` does not follow this pattern. It is
looking to see whether we have objects that the remote side
is advertising, not something we expect to have. Therefore
if we are fetching from a remote which has many refs
pointing to objects we do not have, we may end up
re-scanning the pack directory many times.
Even with this extra re-scanning, the impact is often not
noticeable due to (2); we just readdir() the packs directory
and skip any packs that are already loaded. However, if
there are a large number of packs, then even enumerating the
directory directory can be expensive (especially if we do it
repeatedly). Having this many packs is a good sign the user
should run `git gc`, but it would still be nice to avoid
having to scan the directory at all.
This patch checks has_sha1_file (which does not have the
re-scan and re-check behavior) in the critical loop, and
avoids calling parse_object at all if we do not have the
object.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
I'm lukewarm on this patch. The re-scan _shouldn't_ be that expensive,
so maybe patch 1 is enough to be a reasonable fix. The fact that we
re-scan repeatedly seems ugly and hacky to me, but it really is just
opendir/readdir/closedir in the case that nothing has changed (and if
something has changed, then it's a good thing to be checking). And with
my patch, fetch-pack would not notice new packs from a simultaneous
repack process (although it's OK, as the result is not incorrect, but
merely that we may ask for the object from the server).
Another option would be to make the reprepare_packed_git re-scan less
expensive by checking the mtime of the directory before scanning it.
fetch-pack.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fetch-pack.c b/fetch-pack.c
index 099ff4d..b4383c6 100644
--- a/fetch-pack.c
+++ b/fetch-pack.c
@@ -594,6 +594,9 @@ static int everything_local(struct fetch_pack_args *args,
for (ref = *refs; ref; ref = ref->next) {
struct object *o;
+ if (!has_sha1_file(ref->old_sha1))
+ continue;
+
o = parse_object(ref->old_sha1);
if (!o)
continue;
--
1.8.1.rc0.4.g5948dfd.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html