On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:06:26PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> Here's a cleaned up version that makes it more obvious the commands are
> the same (it also fixes a few minor whitespace problems on the
> indentation, which you can see from the quoting above).
I wondered how painful it would be to actually run the command and then
conditionally check the results inside the test. I ended up with this:
diff --git a/t/t9001-send-email.sh b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
index c5d66cf..9c8fac1 100755
--- a/t/t9001-send-email.sh
+++ b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
@@ -201,6 +201,30 @@ test_expect_success $PREREQ 'Prompting works' '
grep "^To: to@xxxxxxxxxxx\$" msgtxt1
'
+test_expect_success $PREREQ 'handle implicit ident' '
+ clean_fake_sendmail &&
+ (
+ sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_NAME &&
+ sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL &&
+ sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_NAME &&
+ sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL &&
+ GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY=1 && export GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY &&
+ {
+ git send-email \
+ --smtp-server="$(pwd)/fake.sendmail" \
+ --to=to@xxxxxxxxxxx \
+ $patches </dev/null 2>errors;
+ exit_code=$?
+ } &&
+ if test_have_prereq AUTOIDENT; then
+ test $exit_code = 0
+ else
+ test $exit_code != 0 &&
+ test_i18ngrep "tell me who you are" errors
+ fi
+ )
+'
+
test_expect_success $PREREQ 'tocmd works' '
clean_fake_sendmail &&
cp $patches tocmd.patch &&
which does work, though it is less nice that the protections and nice
syntax of "test_must_fail" must be abandoned (unless we want to do
something horrible like 'test_must_fail sh -c "exit $exit_code"'.
I could go either way.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html