Hi, On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:01:05PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:31:25PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote: > The v4 series leaves the remote branch amigious, but it helps you > point the local branch at the right hash so that future calls to > > $ git submodule foreach 'git pull' > > can use the branch's .git/modules/<name>/config settings. But IMO thats the functionality which should be implemented in submodule update and not left to the user. > > I would think more of some convention like: > > > > $ git checkout -t origin/$branch > > > > when first initialising the submodule with e.g. > > > > $ git submodule update --init --branch > > > > Then later calls of > > > > $ git submodule update --branch > > > > would have a branch configured to pull from. I imagine that results in > > a similar behavior gerrit is doing on the server side? > > That sounds like it's doing pretty much the same thing. Can you think > of a test that would distinguish it from my current v4 implementation? Well the main difference is that gerrit is automatically updating the superproject AFAIK. I would like it if we could implement the same workflow support in the submodule script. It seems to me that this is already proven to be useful workflow. I do not have a test but a small draft diff (completely untested, quick and dirty) to illustrate the approach I am talking about. You can find the whole change at https://github.com/hvoigt/git/commits/hv/floating_submodules_draft and the interesting patch for easy commenting below[1]. > > How about reusing the -b|--branch option for add? Since we only change > > the behavior when submodule.$name.update is set to branch it seems > > reasonable to me. Opinions? > > That was the approach I used in v1, but people were concerned that we > would be stomping on previously unclaimed config space. Since noone > has pointed out other uses besides Gerrit's very similar case, I'm not > sure if that is still an issue. Could you point me to that mail? I cannot seem to find it in my archive. > > > Because you need to recurse through submodules for `update --branch` > > > even if "$subsha1" == "$sha1", I had to amend the conditional > > > controlling that block. This broke one of the existing tests, which I > > > "fixed" in patch 4. I think a proper fix would involve rewriting > > > > > > (clear_local_git_env; cd "$sm_path" && > > > ( (rev=$(git rev-list -n 1 $sha1 --not --all 2>/dev/null) && > > > test -z "$rev") || git-fetch)) || > > > die "$(eval_gettext "Unable to fetch in submodule path '\$sm_path'")" > > > > > > but I'm not familiar enough with rev-list to want to dig into that > > > yet. If feedback for the earlier three patches is positive, I'll work > > > up a clean fix and resubmit. > > > > You probably need to separate your handling here. The comparison of the > > currently checked out sha1 and the recorded sha1 is an optimization > > which skips unnecessary fetching in case the submodules commits are > > already correct. This code snippet checks whether the to be checked out > > sha1 is already local and also skips the fetch if it is. We should not > > break that. > > Agreed. However, determining if the target $sha1 is local should have > nothing to do with the current checked out $subsha1. See my draft or the diff below for an illustration of the splitup. Cheers Heiko [1] diff --git a/git-submodule.sh b/git-submodule.sh index 9ad4370..3fa1465 100755 --- a/git-submodule.sh +++ b/git-submodule.sh @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ module_clone() sm_path=$1 url=$2 reference="$3" + branch="$4" quiet= if test -n "$GIT_QUIET" then @@ -209,6 +210,8 @@ module_clone() clear_local_git_env git clone $quiet -n ${reference:+"$reference"} \ --separate-git-dir "$gitdir" "$url" "$sm_path" + test -n "$branch" && (cd $sm_path && + git checkout -t origin/$branch) ) || die "$(eval_gettext "Clone of '\$url' into submodule path '\$sm_path' failed")" fi @@ -361,7 +364,7 @@ Use -f if you really want to add it." >&2 else - module_clone "$sm_path" "$realrepo" "$reference" || exit + module_clone "$sm_path" "$realrepo" "$reference" "$local_branch" || exit ( clear_local_git_env cd "$sm_path" && @@ -577,6 +580,12 @@ handle_on_demand_update () { fi } +handle_tracking_branch_update () { + (clear_local_git_env; cd "$sm_path" && + git-checkout $branch && git-pull --ff-only) || + die "$(eval_gettext "Unable to pull branch '\$branch' in submodule path '\$sm_path'")" +} + # # Update each submodule path to correct revision, using clone and checkout as needed # @@ -648,6 +657,7 @@ cmd_update() cloned_modules= module_list "$@" | { err= + floating_submodules= while read mode sha1 stage sm_path do die_if_unmatched "$mode" @@ -684,7 +694,7 @@ Maybe you want to use 'update --init'?")" if ! test -d "$sm_path"/.git -o -f "$sm_path"/.git then - module_clone "$sm_path" "$url" "$reference"|| exit + module_clone "$sm_path" "$url" "$reference" "$branch" || exit cloned_modules="$cloned_modules;$name" subsha1= else @@ -693,7 +703,13 @@ Maybe you want to use 'update --init'?")" die "$(eval_gettext "Unable to find current revision in submodule path '\$sm_path'")" fi - handle_on_demand_update + if test "$update_module" = "branch" + then + handle_tracking_branch_update + floating_submodules="$floating_submodules $sm_path" + else + handle_on_demand_update + fi if test -n "$recursive" then @@ -727,6 +743,11 @@ Maybe you want to use 'update --init'?")" IFS=$OIFS exit 1 fi + if test -n "$floating_submodules" + then + git add $floating_submodules && + git commit -m "Updated submodules" + fi } } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html