RE: Millisecond precision in timestamps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric S. Raymond
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:48 PM
> 
> Because I do a lot of work on repository conversion tools, I've had
> to learn a lot of detail about ontological mismatches between
> version-control systems - especially places where you lose metadata
> moving between them.
> 
> In general, git metadata can carry forward almost all the metadata in
> a Subversion repository.  Among the handful of minor exceptions (empty
> directories, flow structure, certain kinds of mergeinfos) there is one
> that stands out because it seems to be an implementation detail rather
> than a consequence of fundamentally different design decisions.
> 
> I refer to the one-second precision of git timestamps.  Subversion
> stores its commit and property-change timestamps to microsecond
> precision; conversion tools have to throw the subsecond part of
> this information away.
> 
> Has going to timestamps with the full precision of the system clock
> been considered and rejected, or am I the first to bring this up?
> 
> If I were to write refactoring patches that treated "timestamp" as
> an ADT, with a view towards hiding the difference between int and
> float timestamps and eventually experimenting with float ones,

Do you really mean floating point numbers with approximate imprecise values?


<<attachment: smime.p7s>>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]