Re: [PATCH 0.5/4] t4041 (diff-submodule-option): don't hardcode SHA-1 in expected outputs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0.5/4] t4041 (diff-submodule-option): don't hardcode SHA-1 in expected outputs
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:42:03 +0530
In-reply-to: <CALkWK0=0SfOuKRZvgt=BOBsKTXtaO5Y7-wAWK4XftE_aY9idyA@mail.gmail.com>

Ugh, line wrapping breaks my patch.  I've attached a copy.

Ram

Attachment: 0001-t4041-diff-submodule-option-don-t-hardcode-SHA-1-in-.patch
Description: Binary data

References:
- [PATCH 0.5/4] t4041 (diff-submodule-option): don't hardcode SHA-1 in expected outputs
  - From: Ramkumar Ramachandra

Prev by Date: [PATCH 0.5/4] t4041 (diff-submodule-option): don't hardcode SHA-1 in expected outputs
Next by Date: Re: Python extension commands in git - request for policy change
Previous by thread: [PATCH 0.5/4] t4041 (diff-submodule-option): don't hardcode SHA-1 in expected outputs
Next by thread: [PATCH] Extend runtime prefix computation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]