Chris Rorvick <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c > index 4a6f822..012b52f 100644 > --- a/remote.c > +++ b/remote.c > @@ -1315,14 +1315,18 @@ void set_ref_status_for_push(struct ref *remote_refs, int send_mirror, > * > * (1) if the old thing does not exist, it is OK. > * > - * (2) if you do not have the old thing, you are not allowed > + * (2) if the destination is under refs/tags/ you are > + * not allowed to overwrite it; tags are expected > + * to be static once created > + * > + * (3) if you do not have the old thing, you are not allowed > * to overwrite it; you would not know what you are losing > * otherwise. > * > - * (3) if both new and old are commit-ish, and new is a > + * (4) if both new and old are commit-ish, and new is a > * descendant of old, it is OK. > * > - * (4) regardless of all of the above, removing :B is > + * (5) regardless of all of the above, removing :B is > * always allowed. > */ We may want to reword (0) to make it clear that --force (and +A:B) can be used to defeat all the other rules. The updated logic in the patch looks sensible. Thanks. > ... > +test_expect_success 'push requires --force to update lightweight tag' ' > + mk_test heads/master && > + mk_child child1 && > + mk_child child2 && > + ( > + cd child1 && > + git tag Tag && > + git push ../child2 Tag && > + git push ../child2 Tag && > + >file1 && > + git add file1 && > + git commit -m "file1" && > + git tag -f Tag && > + test_must_fail git push ../child2 Tag && > + git push --force ../child2 Tag && > + git tag -f Tag && > + test_must_fail git push ../child2 Tag HEAD~ && > + git push --force ../child2 Tag > + ) > +' > + -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html