> If that's the case, I don't think it should throw a warning even just skip them. Removing the warning seems fine to me. > Then, in the actual export if some of these objects are referenced the > export would fail anyway (but they won't). Of course it will fail to export anything that requires the missing object. As they are unreachable, it will be hard to provide a ref that needs it anyway. On the other hand, I'm afraid that your file '.git/hg/<remote>/marks-hg' needs consistent references to mark. If a mark is removed, and then replaced by another object, can it break somehow git-remote-hg ? If not, I can provide a simpler patch. If it does, it will be more complicated. Cheers, Antoine -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html