On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Since these are having some problems getting in, let me point out which I think are important, and which not. > Felipe Contreras (15): > fast-export: avoid importing blob marks This fixes a bug, but it's probably not hitting many people. > remote-testgit: fix direction of marks > remote-helpers: fix failure message I don't care. > Rename git-remote-testgit to git-remote-testpy > Add new simplified git-remote-testgit These I think are good. > remote-testgit: get rid of non-local functionality > remote-testgit: remove irrelevant test > remote-testgit: cleanup tests Just cleanups. > remote-testgit: exercise more features I think it's good to catch more issues, but I don't care much. > remote-testgit: report success after an import > remote-testgit: make clear the 'done' feature These are good, but I could drop them. > fast-export: trivial cleanup > fast-export: fix comparison in tests Obvious and correct, but I don't care. > fast-export: make sure updated refs get updated This is the important one. It fixes real issues quite visible on remote helpers. > fast-export: don't handle uninteresting refs This is nice, but can be dropped. I don't see what are the chances of any of them getting merged, but at least 'fast-export: make sure updated refs get updated' should definitely go in. Please advice at which level I should drop the patches, because at this point it doesn't look like any of them are going in. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html