Re: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



karsten.blees@xxxxxxx writes:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote on 02.11.2012 16:38:00:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:26:16AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>> 
>> > Still, I don't think we need to worry about performance regressions,
>> > because people who don't have a setup suitable for it will not turn on
>> > core.preloadindex in the first place. And if they have it on, the more
>> > places we use it, probably the better.
>> 
>> BTW, your patch was badly damaged in transit (wrapped, and tabs
>> converted to spaces). I was able to fix it up, but please check your
>> mailer's settings.
>> 
>
> Yes, I feared as much, that's why I included the pull URL (the company MTA 
> only accepts outbound mail from Notes clients, sorry).
>
> Is there a policy for people with broken mailers (send patch as 
> attachment, add pull URL more prominently, don't include plaintext patch 
> at all...)?

If anything, "fix your mailer" probably is the policy you are
looking for, I think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]