Re: [PATCH 2/2] send-email: add series-cc-cmd option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 00:03 +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 03:21 +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> >> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >> > cc-cmd is only per-file, and many times receipients get lost without
>> >> > seing the full patch series.
>> >>
>> >> s/seing/seeing
>> >>
>> >> > [...]
>> >>
>> >> Looks good otherwise.
>> >
>> > s/receipients/recipients/ too
>> >
>> > Practically this is ok but I think it's unnecessary.
>> >
>> > Output from git format-patch is always in a single
>> > directory.
>>
>> A temporary directory.
>>
>> > My work flow is to use a script for --to and --cc
>> > lines that can be set to emit the same addresses for
>> > all files in a patch series or generate different
>> > addresses per patch file.
>>
>> For --to-cmd and --cc-cmd? So basically you check the dirname of the
>> argument passed?
>
> yes. basename and dirname

Well, the basename is irrelevant, because you don't care witch
particular patch is being sent, you are going to process all of them
every time.

>> While that works, it means you have to run the same command multiple
>> times, one for each mail.
>
> Shrug.  it's not a generally significant cost.

It is when you use 'git blame' and there's a lot of history:

% time git cc-cmd -1 1266686
Peter Krefting <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
junio
Tran Ngoc Quan <vnwildman@xxxxxxxxx>
Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@xxxxxxxxx>
git cc-cmd -1 1266686  0.23s user 0.16s system 1% cpu 19.991 total

> The script could also output the addresses to yet another file.

Which would be even more hacky.

>> If the command is using something expensive such as 'git blame' and
>> you have many patches, this is particularly bad. Also, it's not
>> elegant :)
>
> Elegant is a beholder viewpoint.

You think a solution that runs the same instructions multiple times
unnecessarily is elegant? All right.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]