Re: [PATCH] Update cygwin.c for new mingw-64 win32 api headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 04:39:39PM -0500, Mark Levedahl wrote:

> >> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> >> index f69979e..1cc5d96 100644
> >> --- a/Makefile
> >> +++ b/Makefile
> >> @@ -1082,6 +1082,7 @@ ifeq ($(uname_O),Cygwin)
> >>               NO_SYMLINK_HEAD = YesPlease
> >>               NO_IPV6 = YesPlease
> >>               OLD_ICONV = UnfortunatelyYes
> >> +             V15_MINGW_HEADERS = YesPlease
> >>       endif
> >
> > The "if" part of the conditional that did not make it into the context
> > above is an expr match for "1.6.*" From the name, I would think that we
> > would want to use these headers on cygwin 1.5.* , too. Is v1.5 too old
> > to care about now?
> 
> The opening if expression is:
>     ifeq ($(shell expr "$(uname_R)" : '1\.[1-6]\.'),4)
> which I believe matches any version below 1.7. 1.5 is what is released
> opensource, 1.6 is (or was) available as a supported product from
> redhat. So, I think the stanza is ok as is.

Oh, right, I'm an idiot. I read the patch, thought "gee, I wonder what
that conditional just outside the context is", looked it up, then
promptly misremembered exactly what it said when writing the rest of my
email.

Yes, what you have is absolutely right. Sorry for the noise.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]