On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Is there a way to force removing unreachable objects in the presence of broken
>>> links?
>>
>> Does it help to forcibly expire the reflogs?
>
> You mean "git reflog expire --all --expire=0"?
>
> After that the reflog is empty, but "git gc" still fails.
Although "git stash list" didn't show anything, .git/refs/stash still contained
one hash.
After running "git stash clear", "git gc" succeeded, and the object pointed to
by .git/refs/stash before was gone.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html