On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:29:27PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote: > I think we should agree on a behavior for this option and implement it > the same time when add learns about it. When we were discussing floating > submodules as an important option for the gerrit people I already started > to implement a proof of concept. Please have a look here: > > https://github.com/hvoigt/git/commits/hv/floating_submodules After skimming through this, something like $ git submodule update --pull would probably be better than introducing a new command: On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 01:44:37PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote: > $ git submodule pull-branch I think "floating submodules" is a misleading name for this feature though, since the checkout SHA is explicitly specified. We're just making it more convenient to explicitly update the SHA. How about "tracking submodules"? -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html