On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael J Gruber > <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> For one thing, contributors on the kernel list are open to technical >> arguments, and that includes the arguments of others; just like we are >> here. On the other hand, you seem to rebuke "any" (most) technical >> argument in harsh words as if it were a personal attack; at least that's >> how your answers come across to me (and apparently others). That really >> makes it difficult for most of us here to argue with you technically, >> which is a pity. That lack of openness for the arguments of others would >> make your life difficult on the kernel list also. ... > If that's not the case, show me a single instance when I rebuke > technical arguments in *harsh* words... perhaps, you think any > rebuking is "harsh". Specifically, show me an instance were *I* was > harsh, and the reviewer was not. > > If you cannot show instances of this, then your statement that I > rebuke harshly doesn't stand; I rebuke, that's all. In addition to this, I'm still waiting for an answer of what's wrong with the words that started this thread: On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote: > It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html