Re: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM,  <karsten.blees@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 'update-index --refresh' and 'diff-index' (without --cached) don't honor
> the core.preloadindex setting yet. Porcelain commands using these (such as
> git [svn] rebase) suffer from this, especially on Windows.
>
> Use read_cache_preload to improve performance.
>
> Additionally, in builtin/diff.c, don't preload index status if we don't
> access the working copy (--cached).
>
> Results with msysgit on WebKit repo (2GB in 200k files):
>
>                 | update-index | diff-index | rebase
> ----------------+--------------+------------+---------
> msysgit-v1.8.0  |       9.157s |    10.536s | 42.791s
> + preloadindex  |       9.157s |    10.536s | 28.725s
> + this patch    |       2.329s |     2.752s | 15.152s
> + fscache [1]   |       0.731s |     1.171s |  8.877s
>

Wow, awesome results :)

This also makes me want to play around with the fscache stuff a bit;
about an order of magnitude improvement is quite noticeable :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]