On 10/25/2012 08:43 AM, PROHASKA, Thor wrote: > Hi, > > The organisation I am currently working for uses 'git'. > > In order to manage all the software used in the organisation we have > been compiling a list of software that includes the software Vendor's > name. > > My colleague has listed the vendor of git as being the 'Software > Freedom Conservancy'. Can you please advise me if this is correct? If > not, who should the vendor be identified as? > Most likely, you'll want to put "git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" as vendor for git, as the whole vendor concept doesn't really fly with FOSS. There's noone to go to if it breaks your systems, and unless you purchase a support contract from somewhere there's noone to turn to except the (excellent) git community in case you have issues with it. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html