Re: [PATCH 1/3] t9350: point out that refs are not updated correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
>
>> I know there was a reason why using UNINTERESTING didn't work
>> (otherwise we could've used that to start with, instead of needing
>> Junio's whence solution). I think all refs ended up being marked as
>> UNINTERESTING or somesuch.
>
> True.  Is it be possible to check UNINTERESTING in revs->cmdline
> before the walk?

That might work, maybe Dscho remembers why we did not go with that approach.

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]