Robert Fitzsimons wrote:
Thoughts or comments are welcome.
Interesting work, John. Some initial comments:
* It's a very intrusive set of changes.
* An infinite expiry date isn't valid for all pages.
* The other HTTP headers can change depending on the page returned.
* A single cache directory is going to have problems as the number of
cached files grows.
What are the benefits of doing this inside of gitweb instead of using
something like mod_cache or mod_perl handlers?
Or wrapping the gitweb output inside cgicache:
http://linux.yyz.us/projects.html
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html