Re: [PATCH v3] status: refactor output format to represent "default" and add --long

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 09:15:50PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:

>  On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  > I think that is fine to split it like this, but you would want to update
>  > the commit message above. Probably just remove those two cases and say
>  > something like:
>  >
>  >   Note that you cannot actually trigger STATUS_FORMAT_LONG, as we do
>  >   not yet have "--long"; that will come in a follow-on patch.
>  >
>  > And then move the reasoning for how "--long" works with each case into
>  > the commit message of the next patch.
> 
>  Nope, it's hard to split the explanation in two (at least to me),
>  which may mean that the split does not make sense.

Yeah, that was the same place that I had difficulty when writing the
original. This version looks OK to me.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]