Re: Is anyone working on a next-gen Git protocol?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@xxxxxx> writes:

> I've recently discovered that the current protocol can be amazingly
> inefficient when it comes to transferring binary objects.  Assuming two
> repositories that are in sync.  After a 'git checkout --orphan && git
> commit', a subsequent transfers sends all the blobs attached to the new
> commit, although the other side already has all the blobs.

I do not think it has anything to do with binary, but what you
deserve from using orphan, where you declared that the history does
not have anything to do with the original.

If both of your repositories had the two paralle lines of these
histories as branches, the transfer would have went well with or
without binary objects.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]