Re: [PATCH/RFC] svn test: escape peg revision separator using empty peg rev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder venit, vidit, dixit 09.10.2012 10:41:

>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Tested with Subversion 1.6.18.
[...]
> I haven't checked other svn versions but this approach looks perfectly
> sensible. It makes us test branch names which can't even be created
> easily with current svn. Does svn really deserve this much attention? ;)

Thanks for the quick and thorough feedback.  I'm glad to hear it seems
sane. ;-)

> Seriously, our tests prepare us well for an svn remote helper...

That might be a good reason to make a mock implementation of the
existing git-svn interface on top of git-remote-svn.  Sounds fun but
hard.

Ciao,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]