Re: [PATCH] xdl_merge(): fix a segmentation fault when refining conflicts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 	Thank you Alexandre! I looked for the bug for quite some time, but 
> 	was never close to the real culprit.

Thanks for fixing this!
 
> +<<<<<<< orig.txt
> +=======
> +Nam et si ambulavero in medio umbrae mortis,
> +non timebo mala, quoniam TU mecum es:
> +virga tua et baculus tuus ipsa me consolata sunt.
> +>>>>>>> new5.txt

As a side note I lately have noticed that xdl_merge is producing a
conflict like the above when one branch added the lower half and
the other branch didn't change anything in the area.

I haven't spent any time to try to reproduce it, or to see if RCS'
merge utility would automatically merge the file without producing
a conflict.  But right now it does seem like xdl_merge is producing
conflicts when I didn't think it should be.

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]