Re: Test failure: Test #3 in t1304-default-acl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> I haven't been paying attention, but does that mean on that system,
>>> a total stranger kseygold can write, modify, and remove whatever Ram
>>> owns?  I am hoping that is not the case.
>>
>> I can see two reasons for having the same UID for two login names:
>>
>> 1) the sysadmin really messed up, and as you say, a total stranger has
>> complete ownership of your files. Ramkumar, you should check that this
>> is not your case.
>>
>> 2) the sysadmin explicitely gave two login names to the same physical
>> person, as kinds of aliases for the same UID (e.g. the person got
>> married, changed her name and login, but expects ~oldlogin to continue
>> working). I'm not sure how common this is, and to which extend we want
>> to support this in our test scripts.
>
> I've only been assuming (1), but (2) feels like a legitimate (if
> confusing) way to configure your system.
>
> It is a separate issue if it is worth bending backwards to support
> it in the test, though.

For what it's worth, `sudo` is "broken" on my system.

Ram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]