Re: Why git-merge-resolve in git-am?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Why does git-am use git-merge-resolve while git-rebase -m uses
> git-merge-recursive?

The use of merge-resolve by am predates merge-resolve became
usable by at least six weeks, and longer before merge-resolve
became really stable for about an extra month after.

Even after it stabilized merge-recursive was way slower than
merge-resove until it was rewritten in C for another nine
months.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]