Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > We should also consider briefly whether anybody is relying on --oneline > for machine parsing. I think "log --oneline" is fair game, but I wonder > if people calling "rev-list --decorate --oneline" should be considered. > It seems kind of unlikely to me, considering that the decorate output is > ambiguous to parse anyway (if you see parentheses, you cannot tell if it > is decorate output or part of the commit subject). Yeah, I do not think it is likely. Among the in-tree scripts, git-stash does use rev-list --oneline but the purpose of the call exactly is to grab a human readable one line summary, and it will be happy with any change to make --oneline more human readble. t4202 has many invocations of "log --oneline --decorate", though; these things do get tested. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html