Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> writes: >>> Linux: >>> error: Object 63499e4ea8e096b831515ceb1d5a7593e4d87ae5 is a blob, not a commit >>> error in tag 66f6581d549f70e05ca586bc2df5c15a95662c36: broken links >>> error in tag 66f6581d549f70e05ca586bc2df5c15a95662c36: could not load tagged object >>> >>> Mac OS X: >>> error: Object 63499e4ea8e096b831515ceb1d5a7593e4d87ae5 is a commit, not a blob >>> error: 63499e4ea8e096b831515ceb1d5a7593e4d87ae5: object corrupt or missing Interesting difference. >> That seems very broken. That sha1 can have only one type, so OS X is >> actually mis-parsing the object type? Weird. I would suggest a memory >> error or race condition, but the test is valgrind-clean, and fsck should >> not be threaded at all. "is a blob, not a commit" is likely to come from validating of the tag 66f6581d that presumably point at 63499e4; it reads the tag, learns the name of the object that is tagged and the type of it, remembers that the object pointed at (which it hasn't and is going to validate next) _must_ be a commit (because tag says so) and then realizes when it reads 63499e4 it is a blob and barfs. And that is what _should_ happen in that test. It crafts a malformed tag that points at a blob and claims that it is a commit. The test makes sure fsck catches that, and it does. On the other hand, "is a commit, not a blob", unless you have a tag that directly points at a blob, is more likely to come from validating some tree object. It reads the tree, learns the name of the object contained in the tree and infers the type of that object from the mode bits in the tree (100644 or 100755 would mean the object must be a blob), goes on to validate that object and realizes it is a commit and barfs. It is veriy unusual to get, even on two different platforms, both messages for the same object. Could it be that you have i18n on "Object %s is a %s, not a %s" with a wrong .po file that swaps the latter two parameters in the output? >> What does "git show 63499e4" show when the test has failed? Was this question ever answered (I would prever "cat-file -t" followed by "cat-file <type>" instead of "show" for things like this)? It should show that it is a blob whose contents is "blob\n". > Checking tag 66f6581d549f70e05ca586bc2df5c15a95662c36 > Checking commit 134756353796a5439d93586be27999eea3807a34 > Checking blob 5626abf0f72e58d7a153368ba57db4c673c0e171 > error: Object 63499e4ea8e096b831515ceb1d5a7593e4d87ae5 is a commit, > not a blob > error: 63499e4ea8e096b831515ceb1d5a7593e4d87ae5: object corrupt or missing > Checking tree bd04fbdc74c1ad468ee1cc86d49860490ab3e6c7 > Checking commit c9145d6720f85544cc4bb6009a2e541660aa156b > Checking tree c9176b0dd1a95c80ad8de21784b1eeffd3681f49 > Checking blob f719efd430d52bcfc8566a43b2eb655688d38871 > Checking cache tree > Checking connectivity (32 objects) > Checking 63499e4ea8e096b831515ceb1d5a7593e4d87ae5 > Checking 66f6581d549f70e05ca586bc2df5c15a95662c36 > Checking c9145d6720f85544cc4bb6009a2e541660aa156b > Checking c9176b0dd1a95c80ad8de21784b1eeffd3681f49 > Checking 134756353796a5439d93586be27999eea3807a34 > Checking 5626abf0f72e58d7a153368ba57db4c673c0e171 > Checking f719efd430d52bcfc8566a43b2eb655688d38871 > Checking bd04fbdc74c1ad468ee1cc86d49860490ab3e6c7 > =========== > > > diff failed passed > diff out ../../../git.next/t/trash_directory.t1450-fsck2_120912_205305/out > 17a18,20 >> Checking blob 5626abf0f72e58d7a153368ba57db4c673c0e171 >> Checking blob 63499e4ea8e096b831515ceb1d5a7593e4d87ae5 >> error: Object 63499e4ea8e096b831515ceb1d5a7593e4d87ae5 is a blob, not a commit This is the correct behaviour. > 18a22,23 >> error in tag 66f6581d549f70e05ca586bc2df5c15a95662c36: broken links >> error in tag 66f6581d549f70e05ca586bc2df5c15a95662c36: could not load tagged object This too. > 20,22d24 > < Checking blob 5626abf0f72e58d7a153368ba57db4c673c0e171 > < error: Object 63499e4ea8e096b831515ceb1d5a7593e4d87ae5 is a commit, not a blob > < error: 63499e4ea8e096b831515ceb1d5a7593e4d87ae5: object corrupt or missing -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html