René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Windows Info-ZIP unzip > 7-Zip PeaZip builtin Linux msysgit Windows > 7-Zip 9.20 0 0 46 26 43 43 > PeaZip 4.7.1 win64 0 0 46 26 42 42 > Info-ZIP zip 3.0 Linux 0 0 72 0 43 43 > Info-ZIP zip 3.0 Windows 45 45 n/a 0 43 43 > ... > I wonder what 7-Zip and PeaZip do that gives them a slightly nicer > score with the Windows-internal unzipper. Umlauts, Nordic characters > and accents are preserved by that combination. It seems that unzip on > Linux fails to unpack exactly these names, so perhaps they employ a > dirty trick like using the local encoding in the ZIP file, which makes > it unportable. > ... Thanks for this work. It is kind of surprising that "Windows builtin" has very poor score extracting from the output of Zip tools running on Windows (I am looking at 46, 46 and n/a over there). If you tell it to create an archive from its disk and then extract from it, I wonder what would happen. Does this result mean that practically nobody uses Zip archive with exotic letters in paths on that platform? I am not talking about developers and savvy people who know where to download third-party Zip archivers and how to install them. I am imagining a grandma who received an archive full of photos of her grandchild in her Outlook Express or GMail inbox, clicked the attachment to download it, and is trying to view the photo inside. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html