Re: Segfault in xdl_merge is back

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> > 
> > I'm suspecting this is actually some sort of memory corruption in
> > the heap (due to a bad malloc/free) as the bug seems to rear its
> > head only based on the data we are allocating/have allocated.
> 
> Can you try to reproduce it under Linux and use "valgrind" to run the 
> thing that SIGSEGV's? That tends to be a pretty good way to debug bad 
> allocations..
> 
> So instead of bisecting it on cygwin, try to use the build that broke on 
> Linux too (ie undo the 5caf9232 "fix") and when you can reproduce it under 
> Linux, compiel withour -O2 and with debug information, and gdb will be a 
> lot more useful, but also run it with valgrind..

Good advice.  Unfortunately it may be difficult to get valgrind onto
a Linux system where I can also put that repository which is failing.

Junio suggested that I try running git-merge-file on the three
blobs that I'm segfaulting on.  That's a pretty quick test.

Failing that I may have to find a way to get valgrind onto a Linux
system - but that could take a month or more.  (The UNIX admins
are overworked and don't care much about Linux, and I don't have
my own Linux system there.)

I'd really like to get this segfault fixed before 1.5.0 ships. Its
a rather nasty bug and I suspect the culprit is already in 1.5.0-rc0.

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]