Re: What's in git.git (stable)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> --- Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> >> I am not quite sure about that.  An old timer would work in a
>> >> newly cloned repository after all, and what this "newbie
>> >> protection" is breaking is not existing repositories but
>> >> expectation from existing users.
>> >
>> > Hmm, "newbie protection" doesn't sound good.  It sounds like
>> > "screw the old-timers and let's change well-established workflow".
>> 
>> As far as I am concerned, this is a topic already closed four
>> days ago with commit fb8696d9.
>> 
>> Are you way too behind, are you rubbing it in, or am I
>> hallucinating and fb8696d9 did not actually fix it?
>
> I'm behind.  I'll pull and take a look at that commit.

Thanks.

And sorry that I sounded harsher than necessary.  Between the
two paragraphs, I meant to say "... with commit fb8696d9.  It
was a mistake, I broke existing workflows, I apologized, and the
commit should have fixed it".


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]