Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > So what you are proposing is to make the reflog visible in 'git log' > by a new option? Or to just try to reuse all of its display code > but keep the reflog under 'git reflog show' ? I am not specifically proposing anything, but the part you quoted is about the latter. What Johannes brought up would involve hooking into the usual log walking machinery to show the commits in "merge order" (more precisely, "local appearance order"). I do not think it is about "showing the reflog data", but about using reflog data to give a different presentation order to the usual log output. Your "reflog show" is more about showing what are recorded in the reflog. It is not like implementing the sorting of the logs in local appearance order would make your "reflog show" redundant or useless; both are independently useful, I think. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html