Re: cgit vs. gitweb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lars Hjemli wrote:
> On 12/25/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Lars Hjemli wrote:
>>
>>> I wanted to compare cgit against gitweb to see the effect of using
>>> libgit and internal caching. So I ran the attached scripts against
>>> http://hjemli.net/git/ and http://hjemli.net/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi as a
>>> very simplistic benchmark.

[...] 

>> Could you include ApacheBench (ab) results?
> 
> Sure (I didn't know about this tool, thanks for the pointer)
> 
> Here's the result of a few requests:
[snip]
> This does seem to confirm the results of my homemade scripts.

By the way, which version of gitweb did you use (shortened sha1 of 
commit, or result of git-describe)? I'm interested if it is before
or after Robert Fitzsimons patches which replaced 101 forks in
log-like views with 1 fork, which I think affects gitweb performance
a lot.

The page which is optimized is summary view, if you use projects_list
and not projectroot directory...
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]