Re: [PATCH] send-email: initial_to and initial_reply_to are both optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We may pick up additional recipients from the format-patch output
> files we are sending, in which case it is perfectly valid to leave
> the @initial_to empty when the prompt asks.  We may want to start
> a new discussion thread without replying to anything, and it is
> valid to leave $initial_reply_to empty.
>
> An earlier update to avoid y@xxxxxxxxxxx stuffed in address fields
> did not take these two cases into account.
>
> Noticed and fix suggested by Stephen Boyd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
>  * I am tempted to queue this, after asking you to eyeball it, and
>    then update the author to pass the blame to you before merging it
>    to 'next'.
>

Looks good, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]