Re: confusion over the new branch and merge config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> If you (or other people) use branch.*.merge, with its value set
> to remote name _and_ local name, and actually verify that either
> form works without confusion, please report back and I'll apply.

This is nice, thanks.

What would be nice as well is to be able to provide only the _name_ of 
the tracking branch without the refs/remotes/$origin/ prefix.  Since 
there is already a 'branch."blah".remote = $origin' entry, then having 
'branch."blah".merge = $foo' could mean "refs/remotes/$origin/$foo" when 
$foo contains no slash.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]