Re: [PATCH 2/2] commit: use a priority queue in merge base functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> The script originally comes from here:
>
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/33566/focus=33852
>
> and the discussion implies that the AUTHOR_DATEs were added to avoid a
> race condition with the timestamps. But why would that ever have worked?

I do not see how AUTHOR_DATE would affect anything there, either,
other than to give reprodusible object names.  The test only sets
committer-date upfront, so without setting author-date, you would
still get different object names on commits.  Which suggests me that
there may be something that tiebreaks based on object names?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]