Re: [PATCH 3/3] name-rev: --weight option (WIP)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I wonder if you can
> define the weight as a recursive function of the parents.

I do not think we can.  A merge Z between X (that has N commits
behind it) and Y (that has M commits behind it) has at most N+M+1
commits behind it (counting itself), but we cannot tell how many
among these N and M are shared.

> That would double-count "A" and "B" in this example. But maybe there is
> a clever way to define it that avoids that.

We've dealt with this issue long time ago when we optimized the
bisection count, which involves exactly the same issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]