2012/8/28 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Use i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for git-remote.
>> This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10-233-gbb16d5:
>>
>> bb16d5 i18n: remote: mark strings for translation
>>
>> and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> ...
>> @@ -77,6 +75,14 @@ test_expect_success 'add another remote' '
>> )
>> '
>>
>> +test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT 'add another remote' '
>> +(
>> + cd test &&
>> + check_remote_track origin master side &&
>> + check_remote_track second master side another &&
>> +)
>> +'
>
> This couldn't have possibly passed with the trailing &&, or am I
> missing something? There is already "add another remote" before
> this test that adds "second" remote. Is this test about "add
> yet another remote", or is it checking the result of adding "second"
> that was done in the previous step?
The trailing "&&“ is a copy & paste error. I only run my fixup in
GIT_GETTEXT_POISON mode in a harry, not noticed the bypassed
testcase has this serious bug.
I split the original "add another remote" into two blocks. One is a
normal testcase, and another has a C_LOCALE_OUTPUT prereq
flag. This is because other testcases depend on the operations in
"add another remote" testcase ('git remote add -f second ../two'),
and these testcases would fail if add C_LOCALE_OUTPUT
prereq to the whole "add another remote" testcase.
>
> Will queue with an obvious fix-up with retitle, 'check tracking', or
> something.
>
> Thanks.
--
蒋鑫
北京群英汇信息技术有限公司
邮件: worldhello.net@xxxxxxxxx
网址: http://www.ossxp.com/
博客: http://www.worldhello.net/
微博: http://weibo.com/gotgit/
电话: 010-51262007, 18601196889
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html