Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Only *if* you store it in that tracking branch. The name the >> other party gives _do_ matter to you anyway, because you have to >> _know_ it to fetch. What it does NOT matter is if you use a >> tracking branch, or if you do, which local tracking branch you >> use to track it. > > Having said that, I think we _could_ do this. > > If you (or other people) use branch.*.merge, with its value set > to remote name _and_ local name, and actually verify that either > form works without confusion, please report back and I'll apply. Hmmm... that DWIM is even better than proposed some time ago localmerge (or mergelocal, I don't remember) config variable. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html