Re: [PATCH/RFC] [git-subtree.sh] Use raw subject and body modifier "%B" instead of "%s%n%n%b" for commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Techlive Zheng <techlivezheng@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I don't know if it is the right place to post this patch, I have sended
> an email to the original author apenwarr and have no response. According
> to <https://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree/blob/master/THIS-REPO-IS-OBSOLETE>,
> this is the place, but <https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/contrib/README> says
> different, which is really confusing. Anyway, here I am.

This is the place.

> Recently, I imported a foreign git project as a sub directory into a
> main repo which I intend to maintain as primary.

Ok.

> Due to the project I imported has its own remote repo which hosted
> on the github, I expected after a 'git-subtree.sh split' the newly
> generated subtree branch would be exactly identical to the original
> branch. 

I would have thought so too.

> Unfortunately, it is not. I have fixed the committer date and make
> everything looks the same with the original branch, but they just did
> not end up with same commit sha1 hash. Then, I used `git cat-file -p`
> to view the raw output of the both commits and found that the commit
> generate by git-subtree has a extra 'new-line' character appended at
> the end of the subject which causes the problem.

Hmm.

> I checked the source and found "%s%n%n%b" were used to generate the
> commit message, this works the fine when a commit has a subject as
> well as a body, but most of my commits only have a subject under
> which condition a extra 'new-line' character is appended.

Ah.  Yes, we should fix this.

> Instead, a raw subject and body message modifier '%B' should be used.

Ok.

> Though I think this patch should be applied by default, but the mistake
> has been there for a long time, applying this patch may cause the patched
> git-subtree generate a different branch for those whose subtree branch
> has already been generated using the old git-subtree. Maybe this should
> be explained in the help or man page, and add a condition check or a
> compatible mode somehow.

The problem is in the split code?  I'm not sure this is a big issue.  I
can run some experiments.

                      -Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]