gitster@xxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 20 Aug 2012 00:00 -0700:
> * pw/p4-submit-conflicts (2012-08-16) 12 commits
> - git p4: add submit --prepare-p4-only option
> - git p4: add submit --dry-run option
> - git p4: accept -v for --verbose
> - git p4: revert deleted files after submit cancel
> - git p4: rearrange submit template construction
> - git p4: test clean-up after failed submit, fix added files
> - git p4: standardize submit cancel due to unchanged template
> - git p4: move conflict prompt into run, use [c]ontinue and [q]uit
> - git p4: remove submit failure options [a]pply and [w]rite
> - git p4: gracefully fail if some commits could not be applied
> - git p4 test: use p4d -L option to suppress log messages
> - git p4 test: remove bash-ism of combined export/assignment
>
> I saw Pete and Luke going back and forth collaborating, so I take
> that this may still be rerolled---if not, please holler.
Yes, expect a reroll; this isn't ready to go as-is. We'll
continue the back and forth.
> * pw/p4-use-client-spec-branch-detection (2012-08-11) 5 commits
> - git p4: make branch detection work with --use-client-spec
> - git p4: do wildcard decoding in stripRepoPath
> - git p4: set self.branchPrefixes in initialization
> - git p4 test: add broken --use-client-spec --detect-branches tests
> - git p4 test: move client_view() function to library
I've got a
Tested-by: Matthew Korich <matthew@xxxxxxxxxx>
to add in the top-most commit "make branch detection work...".
Should I send a whole reroll, just one patch, or simply a note
like this? In general, for next time, please.
Thanks,
-- Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html