Re: [PATCH] help: correct behavior for is_executable on Windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> diff --git a/help.c b/help.c
>> ...
>> +
>
> Yuck.
>
> Why should we need even a single line of the implementation of a
> function that tells if a given pathname contains an executable
> command, which we know is platform specific?  

Sorry; sent without sufficient proofreading.  

Obviously we need such an implementation (per platform) somewhere in
the system.

What I meant to ask was "Why should we need a function whose
implementation has to be platform-specific in this help.c file".
The last part of the sentence was missing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]