Re: [PATCH 0/4] Re: cherry-pick and 'log --no-walk' and ordering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Makes sense. The shortlog example is a good example of sorting that
>> completely reorders the commit graph sometimes even making sense for
>> ranges. Thanks!
>
> By the way, does this topic relate to the long stalled "rebase"
> topic from you, and if so how?

Yes, but only through the first patch in the series. Unless I'm
mistaken, I would can get a list of revisions to rebase using
git-patch-id, but to convert that into a instruction list with running
git-log on each commit, I planned to use 'git rev-list --format=...
--no-walk=unsorted --stdin', which of course doesn't exist before
patch 1/4.

The rest of the current series is a little fuzzy to me, especially the
confusion about reversing or not. Feel free to split out patch 1 into
a separate topic if you like, or however you would handle that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]