Re: [PATCH 0/4] jk/version-string and google code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:52:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> When evaluating a change in the interoperability area, it does not
>> add much more confidence to the correctness that the change has been
>> in use for months with the same partner than that it has been used
>> to talk to many different partners even for a short period of time,
>> I guess.
>
> Traditionally our interoperability testing has been to cook things in
> "next" and "master" and see if anybody complains. It would be nice to
> have an interoperability test suite that could hit some common hosting
> sites, as well as older versions of git-core itself. I suspect
> automating that would be a big pain, though.

I don't know that you need to hit the hosting sites themselves, just
the implementations they are using. Dulwich and JGit are both open
source. It should be possible to build a smallish compatibility test
suite that grabs everyone into one tree, compiles a small test server
from each, and runs the matrix locally. Then its up to the hosting
sites to worry about making sure their implementations are included in
this suite, and up-to-date.  :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]