Re: [PATCH 0/4] jk/version-string and google code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yes, I think that is all that is necessary to fix the immediate issue.
> The protocol-capabilities document talks about what to do when
> include-tag is not available ("SHOULD issue a subsequent fetch to
> acquire the tags that include-tag would have otherwise given the
> client"), but I am not sure how well we handle that (in theory we should
> be handling it already, but I didn't look).

Yeah, it is more like "A separate fetch only to follow tags was the
only way we handled it before we added include-tag, so we know it
used to work, and also we know the four combinations of new/old *
fetch/upload all used to work".

We may have broken some combinations over time, though.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]