Re: merging confusion and question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phil Hord <phil.hord@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I agree that 'git reset --hard' should be mentioned in the hint for
> newbies, but this conflicts with my desire to avoid giving chainsaws
> to toddlers.

Exactly.  So what are you suggesting?

Perhaps force the user to go through a series of quiz when "git
merge" was run by the user for the first time to make sure she at
least read the sections on merges and conflict resolutions in the
documentation to understand the fundamentals, and refuse to proceed
until the user passes?

I personally do not see a good way out.  Even telling new users not
to do merges, rebases, or resets but to only build a straight linear
history is not a fix, as the user will never gain the necessary
understanding by doing only limited and simple things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]